From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd3300f3a56e7f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-18 04:58:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-meneldur.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: different compilers: different standard types????? Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:09:35 +0100 Message-ID: <8q7j50537c0969tqvvcbi3hklgihjlg4em@4ax.com> References: <5iub3c.i69.ln@skymaster> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-meneldur.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.119) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1079614700 73582519 I 212.79.194.119 ([77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6402 Date: 2004-03-18T14:09:35+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:37:52 +0100, "Jean-Pierre Rosen" wrote: > >"Steve" a �crit dans le message de news:mZ86c.30434$JL2.362994@attbi_s03... >> In my opinion the best approach would be to either find or write an >> automated tool to modify the existing sources such that they do not use >> standard types that vary in size depending on implementation. >> >Jumping on the opportunity for a shameless plug... > >This tool is already available. Look at Adasubst at http://www.adalog.fr/compo2.htm Great! -- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de