From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f596f25a850be886 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Subject: Re: Static linking of GNAT library Date: 2000/08/25 Message-ID: <8o5lh3$am51@news.kvaerner.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 662325536 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <39A3FCFB.28E60A57@raytheon.com> <3ibp5.5530$aE5.202411@news-east.usenetserver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Organization: Kvaerner Group IT Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Paul Colvert wrote: >I need an answer to my problem, not a sales pitch from ACT! It is not a sales pitch when they tell you why they cannot help you. If they helped you out for free they would not honour their contract with SGI. >My assigned SG engineer wrote back to tell me that "if there is C code >mixed in, then statically linking the files is impossible as of IRIX >6.5." Yes, we do have some C code linked in to our simulation. Does >that mean I will be forced to distribute the shared object library? >Some of our customers have the old Ada 95 1.3 compiler installed. I >don't think I can have both libraries installed! Why not copy the library and re-name it? When you link against it, the linker would use the new name and would make sure it is used instead of the real library. That is the teory. You will have to test whether it works yourself. Greetings,