From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a43733ca2bfeba6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: Package for simple form Date: 2000/08/20 Message-ID: <8np2gm$9pb$2@news1.Radix.Net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 660420423 References: <200008180825.BAA07172@user1.hushmail.com> <8njl1s$bgl$1@news1.Radix.Net> <8nmssq$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Organization: RadixNet Internet Services User-Agent: tin/1.4.3-20000502 ("Marian") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.5.1 (sun4m)) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-08-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: David Starner wrote: > On 18 Aug 2000 15:34:20 GMT, Thomas Dickey wrote: >>> There is a set of Ada bindings for ncurses in the ncurses package itslef. >>> Unfortunetly, last time I checked, there was some pretty serious breakage, >>> which I was unable to fix at the time. >> >>I don't recall your bug report (was there one?). > Sorry, there wasn't one. I got the (apparently mistaken) impression that > the Ada code wasn't maintained, so I decided not to send a bug report unless > I could send a patch with it. Since this was ncurses 4.2, it's probably > been fixed. I don't recall the details, but both the c++ and Ada95 bindings ran into compiler-dependent things that had to be fixed between 4.2/5.0 (and with the Ada95, I do recall that some of the fixes weren't backward-compatible, so 5.1 doesn't for instance support gnat 3.10). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com