From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,36cc6b79786b2ccc,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: reinert@ola.npolar.no (Reinert Korsnes)
Subject: Ada question (defining types)
Date: 2000/08/17
Message-ID: <8ngoog$f5e$1@news.uit.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 659328200
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uit.no
X-Trace: news.uit.no 966518352 15534 158.39.64.31 (17 Aug 2000 13:19:12 GMT)
Organization: University of Troms�
Reply-To: Reinert.Korsnes@npolar.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2000 13:19:12 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-08-17T13:19:12+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi, I am still a bit new on Ada:

Is it possible to make the following more compact and relyable
(less typo/error prone):


 Longs : constant array ( Long_I ) of Integer :=
             (  0,  5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50,
                       55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95,
              100,105,110,115,120,125,130,135,140,145,150,
                      155,160,165,170,175,180,185,190,195,
              200,205,210,215,220,225,230,235,240,245,250,
                      255,260,265,270,275,280,285,290,295,
              300,305,310,315,320,325,330,335,340,345,350,355);

?

I believe this is a clumsy construct...

reinert

-- 
Norwegian Polar Institute
Polar Environment Center
N-9296 Tromso
Norway
Fax: +47 77750501

http://geophys.npolar.no/~reinert/personal.html