From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-25 16:47:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Operating System Date: 25 Feb 2002 18:47:15 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <8nJIRrQtxpn7@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <5Tzc8.111999$H37.15018616@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3C73F480.5010806@mail.com> <9ff447f2.0202220108.7f14c9bc@posting.google.com> <9ff447f2.0202222044.78c44b25@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1014684437 20861 192.135.80.34 (26 Feb 2002 00:47:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20415 Date: 2002-02-25T18:47:15-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Marin David Condic" writes: > 1) Which Ada compiler? There is no "The Ada Compiler". Each one is going to > be implemented differently. Given that, some compilers may be written in C, > others in Ada, some possibly in obscure languages like BLISS - did DEC do > that with their compiler? Yes, although Bliss was far from obscure with their workforce.