From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ece2318f24b35a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: UNIX Compressed Files From A PC Date: 2000/08/14 Message-ID: <8n9gsp$da5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 658238039 References: <3995C90A.E72C055F@acm.org> <8n92qr$1fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <399839B0.F5A138F7@acm.org> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x56.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Aug 14 19:22:09 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-08-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <399839B0.F5A138F7@acm.org>, "Marin D. Condic" wrote: > BTW: If in fact all of this falls under some kind of patent > restrictions, that is O.K. by me. If someone had a package that did > what I wanted it to do reliably, I'd be willing to pay for it. I've > got to get this solved quickly, so spending a few bucks for someone's > DLL (or whatever!) that provided the calls I need would make me happy. Understood. But who is going to have developed such a project, when there are free alternative algorithms out there that are more efficient and more commonly used, and don't require the developer to get all chummy with a lawyer? (shudder) > As it is, it looks like my only real answer is to either cobble > someone else's badly written C code or roll my own. In the interest of > expediency, I'm going to get cracking on that route.... :-( That'd be my guess too. Good luck. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.