From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e66caf3c7c3c49eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei.jensen@kvaerner.com>
Subject: Re: gnat question...
Date: 2000/08/11
Message-ID: <8n0851$78u6@news.kvaerner.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 657063195
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <8muf6l$m0t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
Organization: Kvaerner Group IT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-08-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


gregfisher@my-deja.com wrote in message <8muf6l$m0t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>we are porting from the Sun Workshop C/C++ compiler and the Verdix Ada
>compiler to GCC C/C++ and GNAT.
>
>Platforms include Solaris Sparc and Solaris X86.
>
>According to the GNAT readme files, the GNAT binaries are built on
>GCC281.  We want to use GCC295 for our C/C++ code.
>
>Our code links heavily between Ada and C using Ada pragmas.
>
>Does anyone see a problem using the GNAT GCC281 binaries when linking
>with GCC295 compiled objects?


You should seach for previous posts on this topic in this newsgroup at
http://www.deja.com/

>Or, should we recompile GNAT binaries using GCC295?


This is not supposed to work.

I would expect that it would be a good idea to become a support customer and
get early access to the version of gnat which will use gcc 3.x or gcc.2.9x
(don't remember which one they will be using).


Greetings,