From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e66caf3c7c3c49eb,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: gregfisher@my-deja.com
Subject: gnat question...
Date: 2000/08/10
Message-ID: <8muf6l$m0t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 656769721
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x72.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 208.48.255.254
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 10 14:45:44 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDgregfisher
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.72 [en] (Win95; U)
Date: 2000-08-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

we are porting from the Sun Workshop C/C++ compiler and the Verdix Ada
compiler to GCC C/C++ and GNAT.

Platforms include Solaris Sparc and Solaris X86.

According to the GNAT readme files, the GNAT binaries are built on
GCC281.  We want to use GCC295 for our C/C++ code.

Our code links heavily between Ada and C using Ada pragmas.

Does anyone see a problem using the GNAT GCC281 binaries when linking
with GCC295 compiled objects?

Or, should we recompile GNAT binaries using GCC295?

Thanks in advance

Greg Fisher


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.