From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b94b5d5a8821107,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mjsilva@my-deja.com Subject: Evaluating Ada compilers -- any experiences, tips? Date: 2000/08/02 Message-ID: <8m9l8c$3g2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 653673369 X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x63.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 206.169.137.75 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Aug 02 17:20:20 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDmjsilva Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt) Date: 2000-08-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: While we're waiting to see if we've made a convincing argument for using Ada in our industrial controller proposal I'm back to looking at compilers. I've sent off info requests to all of the compiler vendors I could find, but I'd like to hear any experiences or info (positive or negative) with Ada toolsets regarding e.g. compiler quality, support, long-term commitment to Ada, etc. Our target is the PowerPC MPC555, and the host will be Windows. Here's my email address if anybody wants to respond privately: msilva@amotusa.com Thanks much for any help! Mike Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.