From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b16c9883f36bc904
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Thierry Lelegard" <lelegard@club-internet.fr>
Subject: Re: WinNT ADA compilers comparison
Date: 2000/07/20
Message-ID: <8l7fff$9kb$1@front1.grolier.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 648701760
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3976C68A.12386D00@cadwin.com>
X-Priority: 3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Trace: front1.grolier.fr 964116783 9867 213.44.65.213 (20 Jul 2000 18:13:03
 GMT)
Organization: Club-Internet (France)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jul 2000 18:13:03 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-07-20T18:13:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Have somebody made comparison between different compilers for Win NT
> (Gnat, Objectada, Rational, Janus, etc ...) concerning
> - compile time
> - bind and link time

I would think that the most important "time" point is
the performance of the generated code. You compile
once but you run your application many times...

-Thierry
________________________________________________________
Thierry Lelegard, Paris, France
E-mail: lelegard@club-internet.fr