From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,63ceef1cf4561e32,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mjsilva@my-deja.com
Subject: Customer balks at Ada -- any hope?
Date: 2000/07/17
Message-ID: <8l01s4$gnr$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 647511887
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x73.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 206.169.137.75
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jul 17 22:37:58 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDmjsilva
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)
Date: 2000-07-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

We're bidding on a custom industrial controller, and I've proposed to
write the firmware in Ada.  The powers-that-be here are satisfied with
that, but the customer is afraid nobody will be around to maintain it.
They're happier with C or C++, alas.  Anybody have any good answers to
their concern?

I realize that implicit in their position is a belief that Ada offers
no great tangible benefits to the project (even though the machinery to
be controlled is big, expensive and remotely-located), which I of
course strongly disagree with.  As I see it, the arguments are (1) Ada
will offer tangible benefits, both in reliability and in development
time, and (2) a decent programmer can pick up similar languages fairly
easily, especially for maintainence.  (Perhaps I should show them some
Ada source...).  Ideas?

Mike


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.