From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7332b19c66a79eea
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some"
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:24:54 +0200
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <8kknp7FkqpU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <4ce31bb6$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <2d44ff4d-b3ad-4593-8492-4d16fb6b6a2e@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <C909757A.152E%news@findlayw.plus.com>
 <g15thsvf8vhu$.1pw6yv0xvdazy$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4ce3e3c3$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <k6l7qqa0e8wi$.b1w0f4ni0xug$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ic0v1b$qf9$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <puezn7v9naom.1nrc5rh8wzm7p.dlg@40tude.net> <ic1uin$nge$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <13vas9njbsmps.1npsunlgz5n4z$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net BXNsSqeejMhwW90FnBv3YwMN3M1eeE+yt/Xn1t6IHIi6yy5jfh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+AXB1vFEvMUjBfJzIzxKs7E+fZs=
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328)
In-Reply-To: 
 <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16555
Date: 2010-11-18T15:24:54+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

AdaMagica wrote:
> On 18 Nov., 09:47, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:12:53 -0600, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
>>> news:puezn7v9naom.1nrc5rh8wzm7p.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:14:27 +0100, J-P. Rosen wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>> Actually, It's been decided recently to change "|" to "=>", so it will
>>>>> read:
>>>>> ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range => P(X) )

> Use a colon or double colon:
> 
> ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range :: P(X) )

I like that. The double-colon is visually more apparent than '|' and 
there is no risk of confusion with the earlier and other meanings of 
"=>". A single colon could also work, if we don't want to add new lexemes.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
       .      @       .