From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d07b700201ae95
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry"
Subject: Re: list of Windows available ADA compilers ?
Date: 2000/07/12
Message-ID: <8kiirh$5qo$1@wanadoo.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 645611330
References: <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 963432113 5976 164.138.18.4 (12 Jul 2000 20:01:53 GMT)
Organization: home
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 2000 20:01:53 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-07-12T20:01:53+00:00
List-Id:
Nicolas Brunot a �crit dans le message <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>...
>Does anybody knows how many ADA95 compilers can seriously be taken in
>account to develop under Windows NT ?
>- Aonix Objectada
>- Gnat
>- ?
>Who knows about a serious project developped with another one, if it
>exists ?
I'am not sure what you call "a serious project", but definitly I've build
some
complex systems with GNAT (and Annexe E - Distributed Systems) under
Windows NT. GNAT under Windows NT is today at the very same level
of maturity than GNAT under UNIX. And BTW, GNAT can build itself under
Windows NT as GNAT is mostly programmed in Ada95. I would call GNAT
a serious project :)
Pascal.
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"