From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d07b700201ae95
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: list of Windows available ADA compilers ?
Date: 2000/07/12
Message-ID: <8kiigm$1uk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 645601887
References: <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x71.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jul 12 19:56:15 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-07-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>,
  Nicolas Brunot <n.brunot@cadwin.com> wrote:
> Does anybody knows how many ADA95 compilers can seriously be taken in
> account to develop under Windows NT ?
...
> We worry about the absence of competition in this field, and its
> possible consequences in the future.

Don't worry, the Justice Department is taking care of that.

Oh wait...you said *Ada* compilers?


--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.