From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!enother.net!enother.net!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx19.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should weak counted reference be able to be strengthened? References: <7d9r3whe43z8$.1f2l3n5cz0zh0$.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <8kPbw.589930$No4.383019@fx19.iad> X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:49:40 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:49:42 -0700 X-Received-Bytes: 1152 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2227497389 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:190928 Date: 2014-11-21T15:49:42-07:00 List-Id: On 21-Nov-14 15:39, Randy Brukardt wrote: > And anytime you have a bare pointer, you have the possibility of it becoming > dangling because they're easy to copy. ...Isn't that what Limited is for? To prevent copying?