From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,123c40d62c632159
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Stack based allocation vs. Dynamic allocation
Date: 2000/06/05
Message-ID: <8hf7j2$7s0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 631124198
References: <dale-D70BFC.16062031052000@news.rmit.edu.au>
 <m33dmz9otb.fsf@ns49.infomatch.bc.ca>
 <dale-B8D55E.22230631052000@news.rmit.edu.au>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x55.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jun 05 03:42:27 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-06-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dale-B8D55E.22230631052000@news.rmit.edu.au>,
  Dale Stanbrough <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote:
> Interesting to note of course that the Ada heap version
> is -so- much cheaper than the C version. Presumably they are
> calling different allocators.

Just shows that the measurements are bogus, because in fact
GNAT uses normal malloc/free, just like C!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.