From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a2c7f6cbdb72aa16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: "proprietary", was Re: ada on linux Date: 2000/06/05 Message-ID: <8hf5uh$6nf$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 631117576 References: <8h9r89$n5d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x55.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jun 05 03:14:36 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , tmoran@bix.com wrote: > Do you know as fact that all people who object to the GPL > would prefer the BSD like license? Do you know as fact that's > because then they would be able to use the software in their > proprietary products? a) Yes, this corresponds to my experience in these discussions. b) Yes, it makes sense, since that's really the only major issue in practice. > Or are you just guessing that anyone who disagrees with the > OSF hype OSF? [what does OSF have to do this with this discussion??) hype? (what hype are you talking about here??) what on earth are you talking about here. This discussion is just about what various licenses permit. > does so solely because it prevents them from thievery? Who said anything about theivery? That's very very odd rhetoric. We are just talking about licenses here and what they permit. I really have no idea what you are talking about here either! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.