From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,71c7addfc8ec82f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: RE: Command Line arguments Date: 2000/05/29 Message-ID: <8gurma$3v8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 628778196 References: <393124B8.846F51E7@mad.servicom.es> <39322C67.C6D9489F@maths.unine.ch> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x56.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon May 29 22:41:16 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez" wrote: > for I in 1 .. Argument_Count loop > Put_Line( > "Argument " & Integer'Image(I) & ": " & > To_String(To_Unbounded_String(Argument(I)))); > end loop; > end Print_Args; Speaking of inaccurate answers on CLA (see discussion in another thread :-) .. this is completely absurd coding. I am not sure what misconception was at work here In the above, To_String (To_Unbounded_String (Argument (I))) can of course be replaced simply by Argument (I). Unless you have a requirement to waste as much computer time as possible, the simpler replacement is preferable :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.