In article <DEqY4.9613$K4.61152@telenews.teleline.es>,
  "Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez" <andudo@teleline.es> wrote:
>     for I in 1 .. Argument_Count loop
>         Put_Line(
>             "Argument " & Integer'Image(I) & ": " &
>              To_String(To_Unbounded_String(Argument(I))));
>     end loop;
> end Print_Args;

Speaking of inaccurate answers on CLA (see discussion in
another thread :-) .. this is completely absurd coding. I
am not sure what misconception was at work here

In the above, To_String (To_Unbounded_String (Argument (I)))

can of course be replaced simply by Argument (I).

Unless you have a requirement to waste as much computer time
as possible, the simpler replacement is preferable :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.