From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdbcc5a87c9a17ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: OpenGL Date: 2000/05/29 Message-ID: <8guqr2$38e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 628773060 References: <392b7034@news.wa.apana.org.au> <3931c9e5@news.wa.apana.org.au> <8gtvqj$g87$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3932B7BC.10D0BEED@online.no> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon May 29 22:26:56 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3932B7BC.10D0BEED@online.no>, "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" wrote: > This means that we have a decent chance to find an answer by > searching at deja.com long after your server have discarded > the messages. I think you will find it better in practice to have a smaller database to search of accurate answers than years of CLA when it comes to GNAT specific technical questions. Most of the threads on CLA are pretty useless from the point of view of providing accurate technical information. We also make a point of correcting incorrect submissions on chat@gnat.com, whereas incorrect answers have been known to go by on CLA without correction! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.