From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1533431e7e9d2eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Nontrivial examples of C interface with Ada
Date: 2000/05/28
Message-ID: <8grepm$q9q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 628274847
References: <3930178D.93CA1EDB@quadruscorp.com>
 <bk2Y4.339$q86.98765@news.pacbell.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x58.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 28 15:42:47 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-05-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <bk2Y4.339$q86.98765@news.pacbell.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> >stop calling it a "binding" and start calling it a
"subsystem" or
>   Take a look at www.adapower.com in the list under "Win32
bindings".
> Clearly several of those are what you would call subsystems,
not bindings.


I think a reasonable criterion for calling something a binding
is that it has the same functionality at roughly the same
semantic level. To call GtkAda a "binding" to Win32 in any sense
(even if we label it as R50) is definitely not helpful.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.