From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f868292008c639ce
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: 'img
Date: 2000/05/26
Message-ID: <8gn16g$v10$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 627774176
References: <390F0D93.F835FAD9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
 <8en5o9$ihe$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eonos$e70$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <yec1z3jkq9z.fsf@king.cts.com> <1fIU4.4668$Rx3.250161@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>
 <dale-FF1F1A.14272618052000@news.rmit.edu.au> <wcc8zx7ua2y.fsf@world.std.com>
 <8g8p31$a2s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <wccr9auk6ci.fsf@world.std.com>
 <8ggjg3$hbq$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <8gh9lr$ppe$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8ghcbh$rnj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gj50o$igs$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <8glmf7$usg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x57.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 26 23:26:22 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-05-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8glmf7$usg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  dmitry@gandalf.atm.fh-luebeck.de wrote:
> > All the attributes could be some more polymorphic, user
inheritable, etc.
>
> As well as constructor, destructor and assignment (for
untagged types),
> aggregate (for non-records), 'access attribute (for GC?) and
etc. (:-))


Ouch! That has huge semantic consequences, not at ALL easy
to work out. I doubt it is practical.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.