From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, LOTS_OF_MONEY,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6da15369b6c53c77 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: LLQ: -1 a valid boolean? Date: 2000/05/24 Message-ID: <8ggnm0$bcs$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 626671359 References: <39253CD0.C8DC893D@telepath.com> <8g8o3b$9l0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ge39b$g45$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gebvj$20i$1@hobbes2.crc.com> <8gfe1m$enu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <0wOW4.27734$T41.665890@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x54.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed May 24 14:07:09 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <0wOW4.27734$T41.665890@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, "David C. Hoos, Sr." wrote: > I certainly stand corrected if there was some earlier > definition of To_Bool_Ptr that would have enabled me to see > that "we know that the value is abnormal!" I had searched > for To_Bool_Ptr in my newsreader's comp.lang.ada messages, > and found no prior reference, so I (foolishly) assumed that > it was a function returning a not abnormal value. I would guess you are not using a thread following newsreader :-) This whole thread is about handling abnormal boolean values! See the first message in the thread to see the setting of the stage! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.