From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c197e893ca74cfe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: ada on linux Date: 2000/05/24 Message-ID: <8ggm28$a33$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 626660726 References: <8gffph$ft3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x66.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed May 24 13:39:23 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dale wrote: > Robert Dewar wrote: > > > A bit of an odd division! But in any case I know of no > > proprietary Ada 95 compilers on Linux. > > I just looked up the word "proprietor" in the dictionary and it says > > "person having property, owner" > > By this meaning I would have said that the FSF is the > proprietor of > Gnat, and therefore there is such a compiler on Linux. > > ...or have I got something wrong here? Well most often proprietary in software has been used to describe software which is only released under restrictive license terms. I think most people use the term that way. You are free to use the term anyway you like of course, but I think you will find that your derived meaning from the dictionary is not the one that most people understand :-) I think you may get confused if you regard the english dictionary as the source of wisdom on the meaning of terms as they are used in the computer industry! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.