From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6da15369b6c53c77 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: LLQ: -1 a valid boolean? Date: 2000/05/24 Message-ID: <8gflln$joe$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 626504606 References: <39253CD0.C8DC893D@telepath.com> <8g8o3b$9l0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ge39b$g45$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gen6a$v72$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8geplk$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gf1qh$6bk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <392B1C0F.1D8DEB3A@telepath.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x61.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed May 24 04:26:42 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <392B1C0F.1D8DEB3A@telepath.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > Or are you saying that Boolean'Size doesn't matter, but > Boolean_Object'Size does? This concentration on size is not at all helpful, it is just misleading. You have a boolean object that has a value that is abnormal. Referencing such a object is erroneous! That's that! True, if the object had a size of 1, it could not have an abnormal value, but you know that a stand alone object does not have a size of 1! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.