From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6da15369b6c53c77
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: LLQ: -1 a valid boolean?
Date: 2000/05/23
Message-ID: <8gf1qh$6bk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 626346573
References: <39253CD0.C8DC893D@telepath.com> <8g8o3b$9l0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8ge39b$g45$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gen6a$v72$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8geplk$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x69.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue May 23 22:47:49 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-05-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8geplk$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:

> Ahh, that's a different kettle of fish. I thought the verdict
> was that this was a valid test, since Boolean'Size is 1, but
> that assigning it was wrong becuse Boolean_Object'Size > 1.

Boolean'Size is completely irrelevant

What is relevant is that you have an object of type Boolean
that has an abnormal value (other than 0 or 1), and any
reference to this abnormal value is erroneous.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.