From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2523b982294a653 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada vs ADA Date: 2000/05/21 Message-ID: <8g8pis$ad7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 625728921 References: <20000518063608.06047.00000004@ng-ck1.aol.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x53.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 21 13:50:22 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <20000518063608.06047.00000004@ng-ck1.aol.com>, anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR) wrote: > Did she really have her entire first name in capitals? Certainly not, the name Ada (not actually her first name) was thus spelled, which is why the language is thus spelled. You got things the wrong way round > I'll start writing Ada like ADA Please don't! :-) > if the USA promises to learn to talk and spell properly... Thus speaks a pop-grammarian, who almost CERTAINLY has in mind some rules that are in fact completely bogus :-) :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.