From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,600d9b22cf8375ff
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Generics & Elaboration Order
Date: 2000/05/21
Message-ID: <8g8pdm$abm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 625728911
References: <wccaehnuakz.fsf@world.std.com>
 <20000518204425.29388.00000121@ng-cm1.aol.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x53.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 21 13:47:35 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <20000518204425.29388.00000121@ng-cm1.aol.com>,

> whats the difference Bob ?

[between Elaborate and Elaborate_All]

This is a pretty standard issue, any decent Ada text book
should describe how Elaborate_All works. See also the
Ada Rationale for a discussoin of the need for this
new feature.

Don't assume that brief posts to CLA, even if people are
willing to repeat standard stuff, substitute for the careful
and complete discussions that can easily be located in
appropriate reference materials. The Rationale is a particularly
useful document.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.