From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f27bbe0678fdfc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: huge executable?? - worry no more
Date: 2000/05/19
Message-ID: <8g280g$6ij$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 625236988
References: <391E09C3.FA04871E@mailandnews.com>
 <9EET4.760$pN4.423580@news.pacbell.net> <3920DA5B.2F56@club-internet.fr>
 <8fpu0g$a3e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <slrn8i10hn.4ua.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <392091E9.20999FBE@research.canon.com.au> <3920fbbd@rsl2.rslnet.net>
 <8frant$q9h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 19 May 2000 02:13:36 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-19T02:13:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8frant$q9h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
	Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

>make the switch worth while. More and more Ada projects are
>in fact making this judgment, 

    [to upgrade to the Ada 95 standard]

but there are still many Ada 83
>projects around and will be for a long time.

True.  We still received requests for Ada 83 training.  In some cases
this is because there is no Ada 95 compiler for the targeted platform.
Is anyone planning to deploy a production-level compiler for the 1750A?

Richard Riehle