From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71aa8acfc8368f1c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: BLAS Date: 2000/05/18 Message-ID: <8fvh88$k2i$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 624786871 References: <8fpib6$sbt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8fv2tl$48h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu May 18 01:32:56 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > Robert Dewar writes: > > > I am puzzled, it simply seems to me to be a matter of syntax. > > Syntactically x'base is a subtype mark, since it is a name > > that denotes a subtype. End of story. Does not seem like > > a non-obvious conclusion to me. ... > > Lots of things are "obvious" once you know the right answer. ;-) > How many times has the ARG come to a conclusion that is obviously right > to everyone, after much bitter argument? ;-) Sure, but still something that is in the syntax is pretty clear to everyone, the good old Sanskrit scholars who invented BNF a thousand years ago figured this one out! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.