From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,29f01dc1362fc545 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: huge executable Date: 2000/05/14 Message-ID: <8fn3u1$6t4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 623355917 References: <8fmgp5$jci$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <391EF7AD.8BDC88B8@mailandnews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 14 20:56:38 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <391EF7AD.8BDC88B8@mailandnews.com>, David Dousette wrote: > Is this a command line switch I could specify for GNATMAKE to use > dynamic linking versus static? Check the documentation ... it varies from target to target. Or > And what would the advantages be, provided the target OS > supports both, of using static Nothing special about this situation, all the usual considerations between static and dynamic linking apply in the usual manner (i.e. this is not an Ada or GNAT related question). Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.