From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8c8d1c63ffacf0d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Constraint checking of actuals passed to Attributes Date: 2000/05/12 Message-ID: <8fhtbt$sb4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 622710709 References: <391250A8.99D1585C@hotmail.com> <39171B69.2F983487@averstar.com> <8f93lm$1es$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8f9snr$vbr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <391C543F.83B2A408@averstar.com> <8fhnnj$ltd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 12 21:33:50 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > Ted Dennison writes: > > > But I still don't understand the logic behind making misuse of an > > overlay an "invalid" case rather than an "abonormal" (and thus > Certainly you can cause abnormal objects, and erroneousness, by certain > misuses of address clauses and unchecked conversions of access values, > both of which can be used to make overlays. Can you? The relevant section in 13.9.1 only mentions aborted assignements and parameters passed to imported procedures. But then paragraph 14 does say that objects can become abnormal in other ways too. Perhaps my problem is that I'm missing where "abmormal" is truly defined. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.