From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bruns@tetibm2.ee.TU-Berlin.DE (Warner Bruns)
Subject: Re: Desirability of C++
Date: 2000/05/11
Message-ID: <8ffbbj$6vq$1@mamenchi.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 622307801
Distribution: world
References: <o4zS4.15$8j4.496@client> <t7hfcaay65.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
 <20000507180840.23279.00001711@ng-fc1.aol.com> <8fdhd0$r8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Technical University Berlin, Germany
Reply-To: bruns@tetibm2.ee.TU-Berlin.DE (Warner Bruns)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

 Linux is too broad.
 As far as I know, there does NOT exist an Ada compiler for
 Linux on an Alpha processor.
 I hope to get corrected.
 I was stopping using Ada for my computations,
 since I was unable to locate an Ada compiler for Linux on Alpha
 and on other platforms (notably multi-processor systems).

 Warner

In article <o4zS4.15$8j4.496@client>, "Frank J. Lhota"
<NOSPAM.Frank.Lhota@lexma.meitech.com> writes:
> <wv12@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8fdhd0$r8$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > It's a weird combo.
> >   anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR)
> > wrote:
> > > which one is that then ?
> > > Are ADA and linux a good combination :-
> > > www.remotely.useful.com
> > >
> 
> Why are Ada and Linux a weird combo? Both Linux and GNAT are open source,
> and based on GNU technology.
> 
>