From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6eac62e4f2badf3a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-11 05:54:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: julius_bip@yahoo.com (Julio Cano) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Persistence of limited tagged types Date: 11 Apr 2003 05:54:01 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <8fe0b883.0304110308.2cf7bd70@posting.google.com> References: <1049742443.855336@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1ec946d1.0304080558.2df9c8c8@posting.google.com> <8fe0b883.0304100341.55220d9f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.58.5.46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1050065641 11671 127.0.0.1 (11 Apr 2003 12:54:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2003 12:54:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36088 Date: 2003-04-11T12:54:01+00:00 List-Id: Jano wrote in message news:... > Julio Cano dice... > > Actualy I already posted a creational pattern like that when Jano (I > > think it was him) asked for the first time how to instantiate the > > types from tags. > > I think that post get lost. I don't remember it and I think I would. If i didn't make a mistake, here it is: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:julius_bip%40yahoo.com&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8fe0b883.0302200738.35e427f9%40posting.google.com&rnum=2 Obviously this solution doesn't make use of streams, while the solution of Matthew uses streams for persistence and tags.