From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,11d70610d4cc79b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: storage size pragmas Date: 2000/05/09 Message-ID: <8f9clu$c36$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 621152792 References: <8f4rus$cts$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <20000509091700.21257.00002190@ng-ff1.aol.com> <8f9be7$al9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x35.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue May 09 16:00:09 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8f9be7$al9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: > In article , > Robert A Duff wrote: > > You didn't quote any context, so probably nobody has the > > slightest idea what you're talking about. Explain *what*?! > > If you follow threads, with an appropriate reader, you know > EXACTLY which message is replying to which (you get a full > tree structure). Well, that's always true for us Deja readers. But for folks using normal newsreaders, old and/or read messages tend to get removed after the session is complete (even for "threaded" readers). The unquoted message in question was pretty recent though, so that might not have been the issue here. But that brings us to another issue: if someone is replying to a recent message, its quite possible that a lot of readers will get the reply before they get the message it replies to. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.