From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,897417b380f5731e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: STL, Ada, C++ (Was Re: The Next Microsoft?) Date: 2000/05/09 Message-ID: <8f92io$3s$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 621091377 References: <8eg37k$15n$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8epkoa$b8b$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eu0ob$7qv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <391328F0.1221@synquiry.com> <39133213.64A@Ganymede.com> <8f50hc$hpo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8f5u58$3lu$1@wanadoo.fr> <39182AB3.45A63919@quadruscorp.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue May 09 13:07:49 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <39182AB3.45A63919@quadruscorp.com>, "Marin D. Condic" wrote: > Lots of software is never maintained at all. I've heard that > Micro$oft doesn't generally maintain many applications. They > write them once, put them on the shelf, then plan on rewriting > them with a whole bunch of new features. (Obviously, this > varies depending on the product.) "I've heard" is remarkably weak authority even by the low standards of usenet groups. Really I think that posting such vague accusations is quite unhelpful without at least the semblance of authority. I am certainly the last person to accuse Microsoft of practicing state-of-the-art software engineering techniques in their software quality assurance and maintenance efforts, but I think a claim that they "generally don't maintain many applications" is not at all helpful. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.