From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Desirability of C++
Date: 2000/05/09
Message-ID: <8f80mb$5ge$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620948752
References: <390D001C.7433140B@netwood.net>
 <20000507071636.16841.00001779@ng-fz1.aol.com>
 <8f4lso$1mn$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <3916FEC4.90721B0D@raytheon.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 9 May 2000 03:29:15 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-09T03:29:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3916FEC4.90721B0D@raytheon.com>,
	"Stanley R. Allen" <Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com> wrote:

>Richard D Riehle wrote:
>> 
>> Wishful thinking, I suppose.  C++ is not dead.  Java is not dead. Ada is
>> dead.  Even COBOL and Fortran are not dead.  
>
>Missing "not" at the end of line one?  Or an outpouring of despair?

Sorry, Stanley.  There was indeed a missing "not," my despair nothwithstanding.

Richard Riehle