From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:7907:: with SMTP id
 z7-v6mr16055838itc.4.1539683857626;
        Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:43:: with SMTP id 61mr137063ota.3.1539683857467; Tue,
 16 Oct 2018 02:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z5-v6no37574ite.0!news-out.google.com!n199-v6ni79itn.0!nntp.google.com!z5-v6no37572ite.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pq2gge$a3s$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83d2:564e:d890:44d1:b424:6173;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83d2:564e:d890:44d1:b424:6173
References: <7fcdcc97-67e4-473b-abc4-cd0ecd4501ad@googlegroups.com>
 <pq2gge$a3s$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8f6c0bfa-f7ed-4bee-a766-c786269f13a1@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is the Documentation In a spec File Usually Enough For You ?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:57:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54602
Date: 2018-10-16T02:57:37-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2018 18:50:23 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey R. Carter:
> For other libraries, if they can't be used by only reading the specs or by 
> documentation similar to that in Annex A, then I question the competence of the 
> developer and the correctness of the implementation.

How true!

> (Now you can look at the pkgs at github.com/jrcarter and question my competence. 
> If they can be clearer I'd like to improve them.)

OK. In function Password_Generation.Generate, what are Domain and Master for?
What does Hash_Symbol do?

What does "correctness of the implementation" mean for this package?