From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,11d70610d4cc79b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: storage size pragmas
Date: 2000/05/07
Message-ID: <8f4rus$cts$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620431341
References: <3915BC28.A0D56A68@telepath.com>
 <20000507181719.23279.00001715@ng-fc1.aol.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 07 22:50:08 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-05-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <20000507181719.23279.00001715@ng-fc1.aol.com>,
  anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR) wrote:
>
> The witch is dead.... it was a storage_error

Note also that it is often good practice to allocate really
large arrays on the heap, since you don't want to have to have
giant task stacks for every task in most environments.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.