From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada test example - Linux Software Installer Date: 2000/05/07 Message-ID: <8f2jhl$35m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 620143618 References: <87aeidsgr8.fsf@think.mihalis.net> <8ep009$is3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8es4p0$423$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <87pur1ti2x.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <8euj3d$qtk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3913A546.3ADC7EB7@online.no> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun May 07 02:14:23 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote: > That sounds like a worthwhile project, but if you want to > increase acceptance, please do _not_ license it in such a way > that anyone who distributes the installer (such as, with their > software) has to distribute the source to the software. > Muddying the waters of Ada Advocacy with Open Source Advocacy > would not increase adoption. The GPL is fine for this purpose, there is no way that the GPL could be argued to apply to things the installer was installing. I suspect many readers of CLA are not aware of the principle of misuse of copyright. It is quite an instructive reminder in this kind of case :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.