From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13d178a514c7b814,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-12 14:07:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: mike_harrison80@yahoo.com (Mike Harrison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Embedded SPARC AdaMulti/VxWorks dead code removal Date: 12 Nov 2001 14:07:39 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <8f23da36.0111121407.37471200@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.73.136.40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1005602860 18692 127.0.0.1 (12 Nov 2001 22:07:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Nov 2001 22:07:40 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16375 Date: 2001-11-12T22:07:40+00:00 List-Id: Hello group, This is a very specific question for embedded SPARC AdaMulti/VxWorks dead code removal. I have been informed by the vendor that there is no mechanism for dead code removal in this environment. Has anyone out there experienced the same problem and discovered a work-around? The linker being used is gnu/ld. Is there a possible option releate to this linker? As a more general question: would it be a worthwhile option to add an -exclude:sourcefile:object to ld? Has anone thought of this before? Mike