From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5a97e6705e234408,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-18 15:03:50 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: mike_harrison80@yahoo.com (Mike Harrison)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Expected bytes per sloc (semicolons) performance
Date: 18 Sep 2001 15:03:50 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <8f23da36.0109181403.52128d70@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.73.136.40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1000850630 32236 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2001 22:03:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Sep 2001 22:03:50 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13168
Date: 2001-09-18T22:03:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello group,

Using AdaMulti with a Sun/SPARC target I am seeing an average of 60 bytes
per semicolon on a 5K project.

Has anyone had a similar experience?
Is this approximately what you should expect from an Ada compiler
outputting to a RISC computer?
If we moved from RISC to CISC would there be any difference?
If we moved to GNAT would there be an improvement?
Are there any resources out there with compiler/language/bytes-per-sloc info?

Thanks in advance.
Mike