From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66752102482bbdca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Required Metrics
Date: 2000/05/05
Message-ID: <8eutl8$7gh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 619637667
References: <5DDO4.2237$wb7.194854@news.flash.net>
 <8ek4ea$5ta$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <BQnP4.3698$wb7.344147@news.flash.net>
 <8es65n$5hn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <%MoQ4.7915$wb7.556168@news.flash.net>
 <8eulom$u8m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 05 16:42:19 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-05-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8eulom$u8m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

> It would have been SO much better to make all these
> documentation "requirements" into implementation advice
> for several reasons:
>
>  3. Implementors have to document which IA they follow and
>     which they do not, leading to a useful account of how
>     each IA section is addressed (see the section in the
>     GNAT RM that does this for example).

But that is a documentation requirement too. If documentation
requirements became implementation advice, implementors would no loger
*have* to document which IA they follow, right? Or is that your point?

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.