From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,622a39829f542d91
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry"
Subject: Re: deallocation tasks
Date: 2000/05/04
Message-ID: <8er87l$mo4$1@clnews.edf.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 619040339
References: <39102BF9.584EB022@icn.siemens.de>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Complaints-To: newsadm@news.edf.fr
X-Trace: clnews.edf.fr 957424693 23300 130.98.42.146 (4 May 2000 07:18:13 GMT)
Organization: EDF
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 May 2000 07:18:13 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-04T07:18:13+00:00
List-Id:
Robert A Duff a �crit dans le message :
wccbt2nln7v.fsf@world.std.com...
>
> Read the RM rules about Unchecked_Deallocation. If the task has no
> discriminants, then it's safe to call Unchecked_Deallocation before
> the task is terminated. (Which seems strange to me.) If it has
> discriminants, then don't do that.
I'am not sure to understand the point here! Why is it not safe to call
Unchecked_Deallocation on a task with discriminants ?
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member |
--| |
--| EDF-DER-IPN-SID- T T I |
--| Intranet: http://cln46gb |
--| Bureau N-023 e-mail: p.obry@der.edf.fr |
--| 1 Av G�n�ral de Gaulle voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91 |
--| 92141 Clamart CEDEX fax : +33-1-47.65.50.07 |
--| FRANCE |
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--|
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"