From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,622a39829f542d91 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pascal Obry" Subject: Re: deallocation tasks Date: 2000/05/04 Message-ID: <8er87l$mo4$1@clnews.edf.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619040339 References: <39102BF9.584EB022@icn.siemens.de> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Complaints-To: newsadm@news.edf.fr X-Trace: clnews.edf.fr 957424693 23300 130.98.42.146 (4 May 2000 07:18:13 GMT) Organization: EDF X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 May 2000 07:18:13 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-04T07:18:13+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff a �crit dans le message : wccbt2nln7v.fsf@world.std.com... > > Read the RM rules about Unchecked_Deallocation. If the task has no > discriminants, then it's safe to call Unchecked_Deallocation before > the task is terminated. (Which seems strange to me.) If it has > discriminants, then don't do that. I'am not sure to understand the point here! Why is it not safe to call Unchecked_Deallocation on a task with discriminants ? Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member | --| | --| EDF-DER-IPN-SID- T T I | --| Intranet: http://cln46gb | --| Bureau N-023 e-mail: p.obry@der.edf.fr | --| 1 Av G�n�ral de Gaulle voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91 | --| 92141 Clamart CEDEX fax : +33-1-47.65.50.07 | --| FRANCE | --|------------------------------------------------------------ --| --| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry --| --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"