From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1c8c283347cf0236 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Piotr Trojanek Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else... Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <8ee03ab1-6745-4aa4-82ee-be1eccc9afc9@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.185.161.82 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1303559444 19661 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2011 11:50:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.185.161.82; posting-account=LFd3sgoAAABDYio74AixEjL14wx2GF_j User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19981 Date: 2011-04-23T04:50:43-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 20, 12:39=A0pm, "Alex R. Mosteo" wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a big supporter of Ada, but I'm the only person that I know that uses= it > in my work environment (mobile robotics research). Everyone is using eith= er > C, C++, python or java. > > I ceased looking into other languages because I am so comfortable with Ad= a. > I fear I may have missed some interesting boat. > > Do you know of other languages worth to look at (i.e. that will make an A= da > programmer somewhat happy), that are at least as "popular" as Ada, beside= s > these ones mentioned above? Alex, I am in a kind of similar position - in my robotics team all the people are using C++. I have simply decided not to bother and do my work with Ada. There are a lot of programming languages around and people use ALL of them to program their robots. Please take a look at the list of languages, which you can use for Lego NXT programming (Ada is also there!): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#Programming The question is what is your focus in a robotics research? If it is a RT control, than I see no point in not using Ada. If you are interested in AI, then Lisp is probably the way to go. It has been shown, that virtually any language can be used for a robotic research. I think you should simply pick a one, which allows you to focus on what is your primary goal. -- Piotr