From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.205.134.138 with SMTP id ic10mr206421bkc.8.1340970896125; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Path: y28ni2209bky.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: AdaMagica Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X? Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <8e48e4e4-14a0-4f6c-a133-2716f0506035@googlegroups.com> References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5> <99d27165-f1da-4d0b-a121-fd8dbf637635@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.125.212 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340970895 19963 127.0.0.1 (29 Jun 2012 11:54:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:54:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <99d27165-f1da-4d0b-a121-fd8dbf637635@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.125.212; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-06-29T04:54:55-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, June 29, 2012 1:29:03 PM UTC+2, (unknown) wrote: > 1. Want to see parameter modes in calls. > > procedure Proc (An_In_Parameter : in Integer; > An_Out_Parameter : out Integer; > An_Inout_Parameter : in out Integer; > An_Access_Parameter : access Integer); > > Proc (An_In_Parameter <=3D A, > An_Out_Parameter =3D> B, > An_Inout_Parameter <=3D> C, > An_Access_Parameter -> D'Access); > > A becomes An_In_Parameter, An_Out_Parameter becomes B, etc. I've often wished that be possible. However "<=3D" is already defined as a = relational operator "less or equal". so <=3D=3D or something like that woul= d be needed. ("Greater or equal" is ">=3D", so there is no problem, but for= consistency =3D=3D> would then perhaps be better.) > 2. Expressions with Discriminants. > > type Symmetric_Matrix (Dim : Natural) is record > Values : Float_Array (1 .. Dim * (Dim + 1) / 2; > end record; Also this would be nice. However then the upper bound would have to be stor= ed as a hidden record component as well, I guess, and this would conflict w= ith respresentation clauses (how to handle hidden components). > Best regards=20 > Achim