From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff3b8295175e47f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Help with access types
Date: 2000/04/22
Message-ID: <8dsbq7$26i$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 614255706
References: <956388888.780287@karri.southwest.com.au>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x31.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Apr 22 14:09:18 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <956388888.780287@karri.southwest.com.au>,
  "James Kerr" <jkerr@southwest.com.au> wrote:
> Okay basically I have a Specification that has this in the
private section
>
> private
>
>     type Node(Length: Integer);
>     type Tree is access node;
>     type Tree_Array is array (Integer range <>) of Tree;
>     type Node(Length: Integer) is
>         record
>             Marker: Boolean;
>             Symbols: Symbol_Array(1..Length);
>             Subtrees: Tree_Array(1..Length);
>         end record;
>
> Okay what is the easiest way to access these record variables,
(IE Marker,
> Symbols, Length) from a program that is using this
specification.

Can you give a bit more of an idea of why there is an issue
here? There seems to be nothing special about these types that
would preclude using normal record and array component notation.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.