From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b8748382fcfacc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: friend classes in ada95
Date: 2000/04/21
Message-ID: <8dq859$sae$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 613820809
References: <8dh37m$qef$2@wanadoo.fr> <3B5L4.1317$B43.116109@news.pacbell.net>
 <38FD1830.949F5E81@mindspring.com> <38FD1C9E.7C2B7756@research.canon.com.au>
 <Ft9rpt.4AF@news.boeing.com> <8dldqi$mb7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38FE365D.31C893A6@acm.org> <8dliaf$r6k$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38FF804E.BB59D751@acm.org>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Apr 21 18:54:40 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38FF804E.BB59D751@acm.org>,
  jrcarter@acm.org wrote:
> and I have seen
> plenty of "OO" code that had nothing object oriented about it.


OO *means* object oriented, so the above is a contradiction
in terms. To describe code that has nothing object oriented
about it as OO is simply wrong.

Yes, a lot of people are confused, but what else is new? Most
of the people writing C++ today are very seriously confused
about a lot of things!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.