From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever! Date: 2000/04/18 Message-ID: <8dgjm7$a63$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 612510687 References: <8bdbof$t19$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8berdq$j2p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8df3a7$j2g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Apr 18 03:10:10 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-04-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Dale Stanbrough wrote: > Robert Dewar wrote: > > > (a good compiler will convert such > > a tail recursion to the goto in any case) > > I suppose the stand out question is... > > "is gnat a good compiler?" > > dale :-) gcc certainly recognizes tail recursion and optimizes it, so the answer (in this limited respect at least :-) is yes! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.