From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b8748382fcfacc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: friend classes in ada95
Date: 2000/04/17
Message-ID: <8dfoja$bp0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 612349513
References: <38F6B617.34E216A7@emw.ericsson.se> <38F887AE.8CDA24E0@acm.org>
 <8dc8oi$kda$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F9F4E5.10C13CAD@acm.org>
 <rBnK4.4959$I75.3624892@news-east.usenetserver.com>
 <8df623$m2u$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <t766tgsjeq.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 17 19:27:57 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <t766tgsjeq.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>,
  Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com> wrote:
> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> > it does not surprise me that many people are reluctant to
see their
> > informal off-the-cuff posts to threads be elevated to the
status of
> > permanently-preservable articles
>
> Considering that you post from deja.com, I'm surprised that
> you didn't add that such reluctance is entirely futile.

Sorry, I don't understand. It is one thing to have the posts
preserved as contributions to the newsgroup, but I (and the law)
would consider it a violation of my copyright if someone were
to publish articles in another context, such as a printed
journal.

So you misunderstood what I was saying. I think of what I
write here as simply newsgroup posts, not journal articles :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.